Monthly Archives: September 2011

The Resolution Project Book Thirty-Seven: The Grapes of Wrath (1939)

“Some of the owner men were kind because they hated what they had to do, and some of them were angry because they hated to be cruel, and some of them were cold because they had long ago found that one could not be an owner unless one were cold. And all of them were caught in something larger than themselves. Some of them hated the mathematics that drove them, and some were afraid, and some worshiped the mathematics because it provided a refuge from thought and from feeling.” (p. 33)

The Resolution Project: For my New Year’s resolution this year (that being 2011), I decided to try and read all one hundred of the novels picked by Time Magazine as the best since their inception in 1923 to the list’s publication in 2005. I exempted myself from reading ones I’ve already read, leaving some eighty-six or so to read before the end of this year. Some spoilers may lie ahead, so be warned if you’re the type to be bothered by that.

The Grapes of Wrath cover

The Joad family of Salisaw, Oklahoma is in a bind. The owner of the land they sharecrop off of has decided to try factory farming as the Dust Bowl looms over the Midwest, and the Joads are left with nowhere to live. When their boy Tom Joad is released from McAlester Prison for good behaviour off of his homicide stint, the family decides to pack it all up and head West to the fabled land of California, which has been described to them by handbills as a land of plenty, with jobs and land for all who care to take them. But should the family survive the trek in their ancient jalopy, what is to separate them from the hundreds of thousands of other migrants who also have come to the Golden State?

Like The Great Gatsby, The Grapes of Wrath is one of those inviolable CLASSICS of literature that without a doubt deserves its spot on the Time 100 list. The book captures a period in time so well, and with such detail and gravitas that it will undoubtedly endure as long as books are read, a cautionary tale of what happens when too much power and influence is centered in the hands of too few. Also like Gatsby, Wrath is one of the books on the list I felt deeply ashamed for not having read before, but also probably don’t have too much to say about. Its influence has been so profound, and the quality of the text so high, that everyone at least knows about it, and won’t glean any sort of insight from my feeble attempts at analysis. So I won’t try too hard on that.

The last book I read, Henry Roth’s Call It Sleep, was difficult for me to get through, partly because of the author’s insistence on keeping the argot of non-English speakers’ language intact, for better or worse. In Wrath, though, while the language of the “Okies” was nowhere near gramatically perfect, it was still accessible in a way that Roth’s text was not. Perhaps the poor sharecroppers’ English reminded me subconsciously of the people who attended my high school in rural Alberta?

One aspect of Wrath that really spoke to me was the way in which Steinbeck would occasionally shift his narrative focus away from the Joad family, giving us a glimpse into the life of another person in the era. He shows us the life of a diner waitress and a used-car salesman, among others. This alleviates a problem I thought I might have with the book going in; while the story of the Joad family is certainly gripping, it could occasionally become too depressing to bear. Shifting focus to someone else gives us time to breathe, while deepening our knowledge of the era. Even the aforementioned car salesman, who could have come off as a minor villain without this focus, is made somewhat understandable to the reader. He, like everyone else, just trying to get by. Steinbeck is more likely to blame the system that has set salesmen at odds with customers more than any individual person.

The author saves his real vitriol for the landowners, the true, though unseen, villains of the piece, and also for tractors (Steinbeck hates himself some goddamn tractors), the most visible tool of encroaching industrialism upon the dying rural society. Some of the best passages in the book are descriptions of tractors “raping the land”, or diatribes on how the owners work, just how things have gotten so bad, and why they fear the little people.

“And the great owners, who must lose their land in an upheaval, the great owners with access to history, with eyes to read history and to know the great fact: when property accumulates in too few hands it is taken away. And that companion fact: when a majority of the people are hungry and cold they will take by force what they need. And the little screaming fact that sounds through all history: repression works only to strengthen and knit the repressed. The great owners ignored the three cries of history. (p. 249)

I think that remembering things like this are even more important in today’s society than ever, what with Wall Street engineering a housing bubble that has destroyed the global economy and plunged the world into recession yet again. The lessons of the past are always there for us to see, it is only when we either forget about them, or willfully ignore them like the bankers at Bear Stearns and Lehman Bros. did, that they come back and bite us all on the ass. I can see why Wrath faced so much political controversy upon its release, it’s because it’s filled with unhappy truths like these. It could easily be seen as a piece of socialist literature, as its critics undoubtedly tagged it, but it’s more humanist than anything else.

“There is a crime here that goes beyond denunciation. There is a sorrow here that weeping cannot symbolize. There is a failure here that topples all our success. The fertile earth, the straight tree rows, the sturdy trunks, and the ripe fruit. And children dying of pellagra must die because a profit cannot be taken from an orange. And coroners must fill in the certificates – died of malnutrition- because the food must rot, must be forced to rot.” (p. 365)

Total pages read since January 1st: 11601 pp.

Total books on the Time 100 list read since January 1st (not including ones read before 2011): 28

Next up on the Resolution Project: Gone With The Wind, by Margaret Mitchell (1936)

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

The Resolution Project Book Eighteen: Call It Sleep (1934)

“The sight of him this evening was terrifying. Never, not even the night he had beaten David, did he radiate, so fell, so electric a fury. It was as though his whole body were smouldering, a stark, throbbing, curdling emanation flowed from him, a dark, corrosive haze that was all the more fearful because David sensed how thin an aura it was of the terrific volcano clamped within.” (p. 127)

The Resolution Project: For my New Year’s resolution this year (that being 2011), I decided to try and read all one hundred of the novels picked by Time Magazine as the best since their inception in 1923 to the list’s publication in 2005. I exempted myself from reading ones I’ve already read, leaving some eighty-six or so to read before the end of this year. Some spoilers may lie ahead, so be warned if you’re the type to be bothered by that.

Call It Sleep cover

David Schearl is a young immigrant boy growing up in the slums of New York City in the 1910s. He’s of Jewish descent and lives with his mother and father in the city’s Lower East Side. His father’s rage gets him bounced from job to job, and David and his mother live in perpetual fear of the next outburst. After a series of events show what 5-year old David is afraid of, namely the cellar in his apartment building and women who aren’t his mother, the precocious boy finds out about his heritage in more ways than one, leading to a shocking conclusion.

This book was very difficult for me to read. It was almost like the parts I didn’t like the most about Infinite Jest (difficult-to-parse regional dialect), An American Tragedy (buckets and buckets of melodrama) and Go Tell It On the Mountain (rampant theological meandering) teamed up to form Voltron; creating a perfect storm of frustratingly slow reading for me. Roth uses some very specific stylistic traits in constructing the slum New York of the book, specifically the fractured English that the kids in the street use. While I’ve encountered books in this project with some difficult language, this one definitely takes the cake.

Voltron

Any excuse, no matter how slim, is enough to show a picture of Voltron.

Here the afterword, while liberally strewn with academese, was very helpful to me. Roth has conversations in the book which take place in Yiddish be written down in gramatically correct English, making it feel easy to the reader, and making us want to read those parts more; the intent here is for the reader to feel as David does, i.e. that the only place worth being is at home with his mother Genya. The afterword also says that the ideal reader of Call It Sleep is someone who is familiar with Jewish culture, Yiddish and theology, which makes me 0 for 3.

While the purpose behind this use of language makes sense to me, it doesn’t make passages like this any easier to plough thorough:

“It c’n catch rats, dot’s wot yuh do wit’ it. See dis little door? De rat gizz in like dot.” … “Foist yuh put sompin’ ove’ hea, and on ‘iz liddle hook. An’ nen nuh rat gizzin. Dey uz zuh big rat inna house, yuh could hear him at night, so my fodder bought dis, an’ my mudder put in schmaltz f’om de meat, and nuh rat comes in, an’ inna mawningk, I look unner by de woshtob, an’ooh – he wuz dere, runnin’ dis way like dot.” (p. 49)

When combined with the fact that most of the people speaking English are little kids, whose grammar isn’t there anyway, this book made for some headaches (especially coming after Infinite Jest, which also had its share of strange grammatical tics, but at least they were spelled correctly). So, yeah, I too longed for David to be at home with his mother. I enjoyed the way Yiddish phrases were dealt out though, they have a great feel to me, but the other half of the book was almost impenetrable at points. Reading Nadsat was easier than reading this book. Also a guy shows up later on who shares this speech pattern, but with the added bonus of a speech impediment on top of it. Great.

This book also comes from the Modernist tradition, occasionally lapsing into stream of consciousness writing to show the interior thoughts of its protagonist. While stream of consciousness is usually okay with me (it’s how I write this blog usually), I found it this time to be a little grating as well. I felt like some of the feelings and thoughts David put forth were way too much for him to have possibly had, especially in the realm of symbolism and metaphor. Maybe he’s supposed to be tapping into the collective unconsciousness somehow, I don’t know. He was a very precocious child. I like the way James Agee dealt with a child’s way of thinking in A Death in the Family a lot better, it felt more like a child’s real voice. It’s been a long time since I was five, though, so perhaps Roth is closer than I feel he was? Who knows.

“Wipe your muddy nose. Hurry, I say! If you could read as easily as your eyes can piss, you were a fine scholar indeed! (p. 216)

Who would I recommend this book to?: People who are very interested in the American immigrant experience near the turn of the last century, who have a high tolerance for having to stop and sound out words every five minutes. People who enjoyed Go Tell It On The Mountain, and would like to read a similar story, this time set in the backdrop of the Jewish faith.

Total pages read since January 1st: 11125 pp.

Total books on the Time 100 list read since January 1st (not including ones read before 2011): 27

Next up on the Resolution Project: The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck (1939)

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Graphic Content!

Just a quick note here to mention mine and Lady E’s new project: Graphic Content. It’s a film series designed to broach the void between people’s knowledge of geeky film with their knowledge of the source material. We’re putting it on at the lovely Garneau Theatre, new home of the Metro Cinema.

Garneau Theatre Edmonton

The first movie we’re going to be showing is the 1966 classic Batman: The Movie, starring Adam West and Burt Ward. I’m really looking forward to this event, I’m even going on stage to introduce the film and then hopefully talking to lots of people afterwards about comics. Check out the G.C. website for more information if you live in Edmonton, it should be a great night!

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

The Resolution Project Book Forty-Seven: Infinite Jest (1996) – Part Three

This is the third part of my review of Infinite Jest. Here‘s the first part, and here‘s the second part.

The Resolution Project: For my New Year’s resolution this year (that being 2011), I decided to try and read all one hundred of the novels picked by Time Magazine as the best since their inception in 1923 to the list’s publication in 2005. I exempted myself from reading ones I’ve already read, leaving some eighty-six or so to read before the end of this year. Some spoilers may lie ahead, so be warned if you’re the type to be bothered by that.

Not kidding, so many SPOILERS below. Should you choose to read this book some day, don’t read this, as I’m going to be talking a lot about the last few hundred pages.

So, I finished it, in about two and a half weeks. It’s probably going to take a little longer for the enormity of the thing to set in. It was a lot easier of a read than I had expected it would be. In the interest of full disclosure, I’ll say that this, along with Blood Meridian, was a book I’d tried to read before, but set down, for a reason I cannot remember now. It is a challenging book that is incredibly readable, with only a few sections that were super difficult in that sense. There’s a fair amount of technical language, mostly regarding the science of optics, and there’s some math problems as well, but not as much as say, Neal Stephenson’s Anathem, another gargantuan read.

I actually practiced up before reading Infinite Jest again. When I went to California for Comic-Con this year, I ended up buying three other books by Wallace, Consider the Lobster, Brief Interviews with Hideous Men and A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again. You can see a lot of what was to become Infinite Jest in these books, particularly in Hideous Men, which is the one I liked the least. There’s a lot of formal experimentation in there that’s kind of exhausting to read, but when these techniques are applied sparingly in a larger (snicker) work like Infinite Jest, they worked better somehow. Things like second-person narration, examining a situation to death by looking at every single last variable, stuff like that. Sometimes I thought that Wallace had potentially been affected by what he himself termed “Marijuana Thinking”; i.e. a compulsive tendency towards explaining everything down to the last detail rather than getting on with the narrative. It’s the same thing that happens to Michael Douglas’ pothead professor in the excellent Wonder Boys, one of my favorite movies.

I really thought the baby imagery was interesting, particularly when Hal ends up going to an “Inner Infant” support group meeting, that was hilarious, especially when you know that Hal probably could use some therapy, just not that. It all ties in to Wallace’s mother/murderer theory, which is expounded to us supposedly through the medium of the Infinite Jest movie. I was sad that we never ended up going to the Concavity physically, but it probably works better as a metaphor for a decaying civilization, toxic relations between the U.S. and Canada, the death of history, any number of things. As a Canadian, I really appreciated that O.N.A.N., for all the stupidity and corruption that went into its creation, decided to be sensible and use the Metric system. Imperial measurements are stupid.

If the objective of Infinite Jest is, like James O. Incandenza’s eponymous film, to make an entertainment so fascinating that you just can’t help wanting to read it again, I think Wallace did an excellent job. While I was researching for this “review” last night, I ended up finding many different peoples’ interpretations of the ending, and what exactly is wrong with Hal Incandenza at the beginning of the book (Infinite Jest is set up fractally, so that the beginning comes after the end. The Invisibles, my favorite comic book of all time, did the same thing).

Then I started thinking about the Hamlet thing. As I mentioned before, Infinite Jest‘s Enfield Tennis Academy segments have an overarching story that resembles that of Shakespeare’s greatest play. Some of the comparisons are very obvious: Hal and his dead father stand in for Hamlet and his father; Charles “C.T.” Tavis and Avril Incandenza could be Claudius and Gertrude. But once you get past those main characters, it starts to get a bit murkier. The ghost/wraith of James Incandenza mentions the name LAERTES to Don Gately, a staffer at Ennet House, a rehab centre not far from the tennis academy, once he (Gately) has been hospitalized after an encounter with gun-wielding Quebecois. Gately as LAERTES doesn’t really make sense to me though, if anything, John Wayne, the silent Canadian tennis phenom and rival of Hal’s is Laertes. If Gately’s to be present when Hal unearths his father’s body (which he dreams about, and Hal mentions earlier/later on), he’s got to be Horatio, right? He certainly gets a lot of things explained to him, like Horatio.

Hamlet and Yorick

I don’t think that James Incandenza’s really the old king anyway. Hamlet and Horatio go to the graveyard to view Ophelia’s funeral, and end up disinterring Yorick, the man of “infinite jest”. Which makes a lot more sense to me. It is revealed through academic criticism and Hal’s own thoughts that all James wanted to do was entertain people. Early on in his career, he’d focused mostly on the optics in his films, treating them as an excuse to make cooler lenses for his cameras. The eponymous Infinite Jest film has as its aim to make his son, who he believed to be mute at this point due to his not speaking very often (his (Incandenza’s) being an alcoholic probably exacerbating this as well), come out of his shell by being so entertaining he had no choice but to react. In doing so, he creates a monster, but that’s besides the point.

You could almost talk about this book forever (see above), but I have to call it quits. If you think you’re up to the challenge, give it a shot. It’s not as terrifying as it looks from the outside, yet it is more soul-searing than you could possibly believe.

Who would I recommend this book to? People who are into really, really in depth worlds created by writers. People with an interest in potential future Canadian-American relations. People who have a lot of patience.

Total pages read since January 1st: 10684 pp.

Total books on the Time 100 list read since January 1st (not including ones read before 2011): 26

Next up on the Resolution Project: Call It Sleep by Henry Roth (1935)

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 841 other followers

%d bloggers like this: